Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Debica Presto UHP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has a better rating of 76% compared to 47% of the Debica Presto UHP2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP2 was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Debica Presto UHP2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (72%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Debica Presto UHP2
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R18 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
