Segment
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium2. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Lowcost
Comparison: Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro vs. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Switzerland (Esa-Tecar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Esa-Tecar (0%). The first tyre test of Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro was done in 2020, compared to 2018 when was the Vredestein Wintrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Super Grip Pro and the Wintrac Pro were tested.
| # | Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Exemplary2. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Recommended2. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Ice lateral guidance
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,5 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 0,8 | 1,8 |
| Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 0,8 | 2,3 |
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Show test details | |||||||
