Segment
2. Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Lowcost
Comparison: Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Esa) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Esa (49%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has a better rating of 85% compared to 49% of the Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro. The first tyre test of Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro was done in 2022, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Tecar Supergrip Pro and the UltraGrip Performance+ were tested.
| # | Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good2. Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended2. Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Esa Tecar Supergrip Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 3,1 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,5 | 1,4 | 2,2 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
