Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Nokian Powerproof
Table of contents:
| # | Falken Azenis FK510 | Nokian Powerproof | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R99 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparison, we will discuss two popular summer tyres: the Falken Azenis FK510 and the Nokian Powerproof. Both tyres have been praised for their performance in various tests by reputable organizations, such as AutoMotorSport, AutoExpress, Autozeitung, Autobild, ADAC, and Gute Fahr.
Starting with the Falken Azenis FK510, it is a summer tyre produced by Falken that boasts a 90% rating on our website. Made in Japan and Turkey, this tyre has no previous models, and it has been replaced with the newer Falken Azenis FK520. The FK510 has a solid performance in various tests, finishing in 8th place out of 11 tyres tested by AutoMotorSport, 5th place out of 10 in Autozeitung, 15th place out of 50 in Autobild, and 8th place out of 16 in ADAC.
Some of the key strengths of the Falken Azenis FK510 include acceptable wet braking performance, good grip in wet and dry corners, and decent exterior noise levels. Conversely, some weaknesses include aquaplaning resistance, dry braking balance, response, and stability during lane changes. Overall, the FK510 is suitable for less demanding drivers and vehicles.
Moving on to the Nokian Powerproof, a summer tyre produced by Nokian with an 85% rating on our website. This tyre is manufactured in Finland and does not have a newer model that replaced it. The Powerproof has consistently performed well in tests, securing the 7th place out of 11 in AutoMotorSport, 6th place out of 10 in Autozeitung, an impressive 2nd place out of 50 in Autobild, and 11th place out of 16 in ADAC.
Some notable strengths of the Nokian Powerproof are its excellent dry steering response, safe and neutral handling in wet conditions, precise and easily controllable performance in dry corners, and solid wet braking. However, the tyre does have some weaknesses, including aquaplaning resistance and a mildly perceptible, singing rolling noise.
In conclusion, both the Falken Azenis FK510 and Nokian Powerproof are strong contenders in the summer tyre market, but the Nokian Powerproof seems to have a slight edge over its rival in test results, particularly in wet braking and dry steering response. Nevertheless, the choice between these two tyres should be based on individual preferences, driving habits, and vehicle type. If you are considering the Falken Azenis FK510, remember that it has been replaced by the new Falken Azenis FK520, which might offer improved performance.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Dry steering response
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian Powerproof 72 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,0 | 9,7 | 9,4 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Good | 7,5 | 7,0 | 6,3 | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 7,6 | 8,0 | 7,3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 92 | 93 | 93 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Highly recommended | 86 | 89 | 83 | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 85 | 83 | 87 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,3 | 10 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Good | 6,7 | 7,6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | ||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 6,8 | 7,8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,9 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Very good - | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||