Segment
1. Continental SportContact 7 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
# | Falken Azenis FK520
| Continental SportContact 7
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R18 - R23 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Falken Azenis FK520, manufactured in Turkey, is rated at 72% by us and can be considered as the successor to the Falken Azenis FK510. In comparison, the Continental SportContact 7, made in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Portugal, has earned a perfect rating of 100% from us and has replaced the Continental SportContact 6, 5, and 3 models.
When looking at the results from multiple tests, it's clear that the Continental SportContact 7 outperforms the Falken Azenis FK520 . This is exemplified in the ADAC test, where the Continental tyre ranked 1st out of 18 tyres, whereas the Falken tyre took the 8th spot. This trend continues in other tests like SportAuto and Automotorsport, where the Continental SportContact 7 consistently placed first, outranking the Falken tyre.
The Falken Azenis FK520 showed significant strengths in tests like Autobild 2019, with good properties on both dry and wet surfaces, high predicted running performance, low abrasion, and low fuel consumption. However, it suffered from weaknesses like slight discomfort on dry surfaces, slight weaknesses in aquaplaning behavior, and slight weaknesses in wet handling.
On the other hand, the Continental SportContact 7 is applauded for its very balanced handling and short braking distances, especially on wet surfaces. It possesses very high grip levels for braking and cornering on dry surfaces. However, its grip in wet corners is not on the top level and it has slightly increased passing noise.
In conclusion, if you prioritize perfection in performance and top-tier ratings, Continental's SportContact 7 would be the go-to option. However, the Falken Azenis FK520 provides commendable features whilst also being more cost-efficient. Your decision should be based on the specific driving conditions and requirements you encounter.
1. Continental SportContact 7 Premium2. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended2. Continental SportContact 7 Outstanding
2. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,4 | |||||
Continental SportContact 7 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 1,5 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Good | |||||||
Continental SportContact 7 Rating: Outstanding | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Very good | |||||||
Continental SportContact 7 Rating: Very good | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
Continental SportContact 7 Rating: Outstanding | 2+ | 1- | |||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
Continental SportContact 7 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Good - | |||||||
Continental SportContact 7 Rating: Outstanding | |||||||
Show test details |