Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium2. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Falken (54%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV has a better rating of 94% compared to 59% of the Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 235/65 R17 test, where both the EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro and the CrossClimate 2 SUV were tested.
| # | Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Test winner2. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falken EuroAllSeason AS220 Pro Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
