14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Falken (58%). The first tyre test of Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV was done in 2019, compared to 2021 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the EUROWINTER HS01 SUV is made in Turkey and WinterContact TS 870 P is made in Czech Republic.

#	Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 870 P /94%

Dimensions	R16 - R21	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 52

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 21x

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 3x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 7.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 8.

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 10.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.29

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 8.67

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2024

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 2021

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

81%

Falken
EUROWINTER HS01 SUV

79%

Wet braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 74%

Wet circle cornering

1. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 82%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

Wet handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 77%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV B

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

Snow

(Overall rating)

Falken
EUROWINTER HS01 SUV

79%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 77%

Snow braking

1. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 87%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

Snow handling

1. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 73%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 58%

Snow cornering

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 83%

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 79%

Lateral guidance on snow

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 85%

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 80%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

85%

Falken
EUROWINTER HS01 SUV

77%

Dry handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 87%

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 72%

Dry braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 78%

Dry steering response

1. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 86%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

77%

Falken
EUROWINTER HS01 SUV

76%

Exterior noise

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 81%

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 77%

Comfort

1. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 76%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 73%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

94%

Falken
EUROWINTER HS01 SUV

57%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 94%

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV 57%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV D

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands