Segment
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Falken (58%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof P has a better rating of 62% compared to 53% of the Falken EuroWinter HS01. The first tyre test of Falken EuroWinter HS01 was done in 2017, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the EuroWinter HS01 and the WR Snowproof P were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Falken EuroWinter HS01 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof P also have B wet ratings. We also know where EuroWinter HS01 is made - Turkey.
# | Falken EuroWinter HS01
| Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R21 | R17 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 36,3 | 25,9 | |||||
Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
Show test details |