Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Premium2. Falken Sincera SN110 Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Sincera SN110 vs. Michelin Primacy 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Falken (59%). In this particular case, the Michelin Primacy 4 has a better rating of 89% compared to 52% of the Falken Sincera SN110. The first tyre test of Falken Sincera SN110 was done in 2022, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin Primacy 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 185/65 R15 test, where both the Sincera SN110 and the Primacy 4 were tested.
| # | Falken Sincera SN110 | Michelin Primacy 4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Highly recommended2. Falken Sincera SN110 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4 Recommended2. Falken Sincera SN110 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Primacy 4 68 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,6 | 2,7 | 1 | 1,7 | ||
| Falken Sincera SN110 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,7 | 3,0 | 1,7 | ||
| Michelin Primacy 4 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||