Segment
1. Firestone Destination Winter Upper-middle2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Firestone (60%). But when it comes to comparing Firestone Destination Winter and Nokian WR SUV 4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Firestone Destination Winter was done in 2017, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR SUV 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the Destination Winter and the WR SUV 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Firestone Destination Winter has B wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C rating.
# | Firestone Destination Winter
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Destination Winter Upper-middle2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. Firestone Destination Winter Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Firestone Destination Winter Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
Firestone Destination Winter Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3+ | 1- | ||||
Nokian WR SUV 4 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 1 | ||||
Show test details |