Segment
1. Firestone Firehawk Sport Upper-middle2. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
Comparison: Firestone Firehawk Sport vs. Falken Azenis FK510
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Falken (68%). In this particular case, the Firestone Firehawk Sport has a better rating of 76% compared to 58% of the Falken Azenis FK510. The first tyre test of Firestone Firehawk Sport was done in 2023, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Firestone Firehawk Sport dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (69%) of the Falken Azenis FK510 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Firehawk Sport is made in Italy and Azenis FK510 is made in Japan/Turkey.
| # | Firestone Firehawk Sport
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Firestone Firehawk Sport Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Firestone Firehawk Sport Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Dry steering response
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Falken Azenis FK510 69 dB
