Segment
2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Firestone Multihawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. But when it comes to comparing Firestone Multihawk 2 and Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Multihawk 2 and the Efficientgrip Compact were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Firestone Multihawk 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 81% of Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact has B rating.
| # | Firestone Multihawk 2
| Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R15 | R13 - R15 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Multihawk 2 Satisfactory2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Multihawk 2 Satisfactory2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Firestone Multihawk 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,4 | ||
| Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 1,9 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
