Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Firestone (69%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 has a better rating of 77% compared to 57% of the Firestone Roadhawk. The first tyre test of Firestone Roadhawk was done in 2018, compared to 2023 when was the Bridgestone Turanza 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Roadhawk and the Turanza 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Firestone Roadhawk dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (79%) of the Bridgestone Turanza 6 also have A wet ratings.
# | Firestone Roadhawk
| Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary
2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | |||||||
Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 36,6 | 28,7 | |||||
Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 36,9 | 27,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 67.7 | 30.9 | |||||
Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 63.8 | 27.6 | |||||
Show test details |