Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk has a better rating of 72% compared to 48% of the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27. The first tyre test of Firestone Roadhawk was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Roadhawk and the EcowinG ES01 KH27 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Firestone Roadhawk has A wet grip rating, whereas 80% of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 has C rating.
# | Firestone Roadhawk | Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Upper-middle
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary
2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
1. Firestone Roadhawk 71 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 1,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,5 | ||
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 36,5 | |||||
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 | 38,3 | 40,4 | |||||
Show test details |