• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk has a better rating of 72% compared to 48% of the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27. The first tyre test of Firestone Roadhawk was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Roadhawk and the EcowinG ES01 KH27 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 96% of Firestone Roadhawk has A wet grip rating, whereas 80% of Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 has C rating.

# Firestone Roadhawk
/72%
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
/48%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR15 - R21 R14 - R17
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,91,52,10,51,4
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Satisfactory
2,81,5 2,92,52,5
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Rating: Satisfactory
2,82,82,82,02,0
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,534,3
Firestone Roadhawk35,236,5
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH2738,340,4
Show test details