Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk has a better rating of 57% compared to 51% of the Kumho Ecowing ES31. The first tyre test of Firestone Roadhawk was done in 2018, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecowing ES31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Roadhawk and the Ecowing ES31 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Firestone Roadhawk has A wet grip rating, whereas 58% of Kumho Ecowing ES31 has B rating.
# | Firestone Roadhawk
| Kumho Ecowing ES31
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
Show test details |