• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecowing ES31

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk has a better rating of 57% compared to 51% of the Kumho Ecowing ES31. The first tyre test of Firestone Roadhawk was done in 2018, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecowing ES31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Roadhawk and the Ecowing ES31 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Firestone Roadhawk has A wet grip rating, whereas 58% of Kumho Ecowing ES31 has B rating.

# Firestone Roadhawk
/57%
Kumho Ecowing ES31
/51%

Add to comparison

Firestone
Kumho
DimensionsR15 - R21 R13 - R17
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,11,52,41,01,2
Firestone Roadhawk
Rating: Satisfactory
2,92,23,02,02,3
Kumho Ecowing ES31
Rating: Satisfactory
2,71,5 2,81,51,9
Show test details