Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Nokian Wetproof SUV
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Nokian (62%). In this particular case, the Firestone Roadhawk has a better rating of 57% compared to 55% of the Nokian Wetproof SUV. The first tyre test of Firestone Roadhawk was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian Wetproof SUV first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Firestone Roadhawk dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Wetproof SUV also have A wet ratings.
| # | Firestone Roadhawk
| Nokian Wetproof SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
