Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Firestone (60%). The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Winterhawk 3 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B rating.
# | Firestone Winterhawk 3
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 1 | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 36,3 | 27,9 | |||||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,1 | 25,9 | |||||
Show test details |