Segment
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Firestone (65%). In this particular case, the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 has a better rating of 78% compared to 60% of the Firestone Winterhawk 4. The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 4 was done in 2020, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Winterhawk 4 and the W462 Winter i*cept RS3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Firestone Winterhawk 4 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 also have B wet ratings. We also know where Winterhawk 4 is made - Italy.
# | Firestone Winterhawk 4
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Highly recommended2. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
Firestone WinterHawk 4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 2.2 |
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 1.7 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 4 | 35.5 | 30.9 | |||||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | 37.8 | 29.1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2 | 2.1 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Good | 3 | 2.3 | |||||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Good | 2.8 | 2.2 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 4 | 36 | 26,4 | |||||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | 35,3 | 26,6 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 3+ | |||
Show test details |