• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Firestone (50%). In this particular case, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 has a better rating of 69% compared to 57% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 4 was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Winterhawk 4 and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Firestone Winterhawk 4 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Winterhawk 4 is made in Italy and WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation.

# Firestone Winterhawk 4
Nokian WR Snowproof

Add to comparison

DimensionsR14 - R20 R14 - R20
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDrySnowRolling resistanceWear
Best values in test2+2+11-1
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Rating: Satisfactory
2+ 3+1- 2+2
Nokian WR Snowproof
Rating: Satisfactory
322-1- 2+
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,127,3
Firestone Winterhawk 433,528,6
Nokian WR Snowproof36,529,2
Show test details