Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
# | Fulda EcoControl HP
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this tyre comparison, we are focusing on the Fulda EcoControl HP and the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125. By analyzing various tyre tests, the effectiveness of these two tyres can be compared and contrasted.
Starting with the Fulda EcoControl HP, an effective summer tyre. It's worth pointing out that this model has been replaced by the Fulda EcoControl HP2. We rate this tyre at 51%, indicating that although it is a fair performer, it may not deliver the highest results in all aspects. However, in the Autobild and ADAC test categories, the tyre scored particularly well in mileage and price/value ratio. More specifically, it secured 7th and 10th position out of 50 and 16 tyres respectively. A more in-depth look at Fulda tyres could assist you in your buying decision.
On the other hand, we have the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125. Please note that this model has been replaced by the Hankook Ventus Prime 4. With a solid rating of 72%, this summer tyre achieves higher performance than its Fulda counterpart in our tests. Made in Hungary, this tyre offers an impressive dry handling feature as per the Autobild test, and scored 2nd out of 50, offering higher test results overall. Furthermore, the tyre also secured 5th position in 16 tyres as per the ADAC test. If you're looking for tyres with a strong performance record, then Hankook is definitely a manufacturer to consider.
In conclusion, while both tyres have their strengths, according to our tests and reviews, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 outperforms the Fulda EcoControl HP, especially in aspects such as dry handling. However, the Fulda EcoControl HP has its strength in mileage and price/value ratio. Always remember to consider your specific requirements and driving conditions before making your final decision.
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
Fulda EcoControl HP | 37 | 39,6 | |||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,5 | 35,2 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | ||
Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,6 | 3,4 | 1,5 | 2,2 | ||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,6 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Recommended | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 1- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
Fulda EcoControl HP | 36,4 | 28,8 | |||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,6 | 27,9 | |||||
Show test details |