Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Hankook (56%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has a better rating of 77% compared to 56% of the Fulda EcoControl HP. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the EcoControl HP and the Ventus Prime3 K125 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Fulda EcoControl HP has B wet grip rating, whereas 71% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has A rating.
| # | Fulda EcoControl HP | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP 69 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP | 37 | 39,6 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,5 | 35,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | ||
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,6 | 3,4 | 1,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,6 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Recommended | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP | 36,4 | 28,8 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,6 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||