Segment
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle2. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda MultiControl vs. Kumho Solus HA31
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Fulda (6%). The first tyre test of Fulda MultiControl was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho Solus HA31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the MultiControl and the Solus HA31 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 84% of Fulda MultiControl dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kumho Solus HA31 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Fulda MultiControl
| Kumho Solus HA31
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Solus HA31 8.332. Fulda MultiControl 23.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 45,7 | 57 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
