Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Goform GH18 Lowcost
Comparison: Goform GH18 vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goform) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Goform (0%). The first tyre test of Goform GH18 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the GH18 and the Azenis FK510 were tested.
| # | Goform GH18
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Goform GH18 41.
Worst position in test
2. Goform GH18 41.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Goform GH18 | 37,3 | 44,1 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 35,5 | 34,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
