Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Goodride SW608 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Goodride (7%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has a better rating of 61% compared to 7% of the Goodride SW608. The first tyre test of Goodride SW608 was done in 2018, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the SW608 and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Goodride SW608
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Goodride SW608 Lowcost
2. Goodride SW608 32.2
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Goodride SW608 | 40.6 | - | |||||
Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Goodride SW608 Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Good | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
Goodride SW608 | 40 | ||||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 35,9 | 27,3 | |||||
Show test details |