Segment
1. Goodride SW612 Lowcost2. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride SW612 vs. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis). Generally, Maxxis winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Goodride (7%). But when it comes to comparing Goodride SW612 and Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Goodride SW612 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the SW612 and the Vansmart Snow WL2 were tested.
| # | Goodride SW612
| Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R12 - R16 | R12 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Still recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Goodride SW612 Rating: Not recommended | 3,1 | 3,6 | 4,9 | 2,3 | 3,4 | 3,0 | 1,6 |
| Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Rating: Not recommended | 2,7 | 2,5 | 5,0 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 1,9 |
| Show test details | |||||||
