Segment
2. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, GoodYear summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Nokian (62%). In this particular case, the Nokian Wetproof SUV has a better rating of 55% compared to 46% of the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The first tyre test of GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 was done in 2019, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian Wetproof SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Promobil 2022 235/55 R17 test, where both the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and the Wetproof SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 74% of GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian Wetproof SUV also have A wet ratings. We also know where Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is made - Slovenia/Germany.
# | GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
| Nokian Wetproof SUV
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle
1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary
Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 7,3 | 7,7 | 5,9 | ||||
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Recommended | 7,9 | 8,4 | 5,9 | ||||
Nokian WetProof SUV Rating: Recommended | 8,0 | 7,9 | 7,3 | ||||
Show test details |