Segment
2. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than GoodYear (85%). The first tyre test of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the UltraGrip Performance+ and the Pilot Alpin PA4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has B wet grip rating, whereas 90% of Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 has C rating.
# | GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
| Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R17 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Premium
1. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Exemplary2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended2. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
Show test details |