Segment
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Firestone (60%). The first tyre test of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 and the Winterhawk 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Firestone Winterhawk 4 also have B wet ratings.
# | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1
| Firestone Winterhawk 4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Highly recommended
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Recommended2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Satisfactory
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 386 | 143 | 138 | 118 | |||
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Rating: Highly recommended | 352 | 122 | 129 | 101 | |||
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Highly recommended | 363 | 125 | 123 | 115 | |||
Show test details |