Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium2. Gt Radial Sportactive 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Gt Radial Sportactive 2 vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Gt) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). The first tyre test of Gt Radial Sportactive 2 was done in 2025, compared to 2021 when was the Bridgestone Potenza Sport first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Radial Sportactive 2 and the Potenza Sport were tested.
| # | Gt Radial Sportactive 2
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| GT Radial SportActive 2 | 36.0 | 31.7 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport | 32.6 | 27.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
