Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Kleber Quadraxer 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Looking closely at the tyres, we focus on the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 and the Kleber Quadraxer 3 from tyre manufacturers Hankook and Kleber respectively.
The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750, an allround type tyre engraved with an impressive rating of 84%, originated from Korea with prior models like Hankook Kinergy 4S. According to test reviews, it has exceptional dry handling and best wet braking making it perform well in different terrains. The tyre also receives positive feedback on its comfort levels and low rolling resistance. Nevertheless, it has notable weaknesses with its aquaplaning resistance and average snow performance.
On the other hand, the Kleber Quadraxer 3, a product from Poland, carries a higher rating of 90%. It is a successor of the Kleber Quadraxer 2. The test data show that it notches a high score in comfort and has an impressive performance on snow handling. Furthermore, it has competent dry braking and good aquaplaning resistance. However, it lags behind with its wet handling and has a higher than average rolling resistance.
The Autobild test of 2023 highlighted that the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 secured 3rd position among 15 tyres tested. It signifies good script in terms of 'Snow braking' and 'Snow handling' and other parameters like 'Aquaplaning - cross' and 'Exterior noise'. For the same test, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 obtained the 4th position showcasing its strength in Dry Braking and Comfort.
To sum up, both tyres exhibit unique strengths and weaknesses. The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 shows balanced performance with excellent dry handling and braking, but lacks in aquaplaning resistance. On the contrary, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 excels in comfort and snow handling but falls short in wet handling. Choosing between these two outstanding tyres fundamentally relies on conditions they are often used and individual preference.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 41.3 | 49.5 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 38.3 | 48.5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 42,1 | 48 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 40,3 | 49,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 3+ | |||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
