Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Vredestein (57%). The first tyre test of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Vredestein Quatrac 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Kinergy 4S2 H750 and the Quatrac 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Kinergy 4S2 H750 is made in Korea and Quatrac 5 is made in Netherlands.
# | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Vredestein Quatrac 5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Premium
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Satisfactory
2. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | 2- | |||
Vredestein Quatrac 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,4 | 45,2 | |||||
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 43,1 | 47,8 | |||||
Vredestein Quatrac 5 | 43,9 | 48,6 | |||||
Show test details |