Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Hankook (76%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has a better rating of 77% compared to 71% of the Michelin e.Primacy. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was done in 2022, compared to 2023 when was the Michelin e.Primacy first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ventus Prime 4 and the e.Primacy were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin e.Primacy has B rating.
# | Hankook Ventus Prime 4
| Michelin e.Primacy
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Michelin e.Primacy Very good
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended2. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,4 | |||||
Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient | 1,3 | 3,9 | |||||
Show test details |