Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
If you're caught in the clash of the titans between Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 and Firestone Roadhawk, this comparison might help you make the right decision.
First up, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125, tied in our ratings with Firestone Roadhawk at 72%. It's a summer tyre hailing from Hungary. Interestingly, it's also the first equipment on the Citroën C3 Aircross. A prominent successor, Hankook Ventus Prime 4, has replaced the K125, indicating a commitment to continual improvement from Hankook.
Its strengths shone across multiple tests. Particularly impressive was its top ranking for best features like dry braking, dry handling, and wet braking in the Autobild test, placing it first out of 51 tyres. In fact, it reliably ranked within the top five in three tests, demonstrating a consistent performance.
On to the Firestone Roadhawk, made by the tire powerhouse, Firestone. Although the manufacturer hasn't provided the made-in details or if it's designated as first equipment on any vehicle, like the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125, it's a summer tyre with a rating of 72%. There doesn't appear to be a newer model replacing it, which means all its effort is concentrated here.
In terms of performance, the Roadhawk stood out in Autobild's test, featurnig among the top three for wet handling and dry handling. Surprisingly, they also deliver an impressive wet-side guide. Out of 51 tyres tested, it secured a laudable third position. Meanwhile, an unexpected advantage came in the ACE test, where the Roadhawk showed a low rolling resistance, securing the tire's seventh position.
Overall, both tyres have delivered outstanding performances in different areas. The final verdict? If dry braking and handling are your biggest concerns, then opt for the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125. Otherwise, if you're keen on wet handling and driving with lower rolling resistance, the Firestone Roadhawk might be your best bet. Remember, both tyres earned a tied rating of 72%, showcasing their well-rounded performance capabilities.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,8 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | 1- | 1- | 3+ | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Highly recommended | 240 | 111 | 129 | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 121 | 75 | 121 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 56 | 20 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 36 | 47 | 19 | 7 | 13 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Conditionally recommended | 43 | 44 | 20 | 5 | 14 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2- | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,5 | 35,2 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 36,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,6 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,2 | 1,7 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
