Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has a better rating of 52% compared to 51% of the Kumho Ecowing ES31. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 was done in 2016, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecowing ES31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Ventus Prime3 K125 and the Ecowing ES31 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has A wet grip rating, whereas 58% of Kumho Ecowing ES31 has B rating. We also know where Ventus Prime3 K125 is made - Hungary.
# | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Kumho Ecowing ES31
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,8 | ||
Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
Show test details |