• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Ventus Prime3 K125 and the BluEarth RV-02 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Ventus Prime3 K125 is made - Hungary.

# Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
/52%
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
/0%

Add to comparison

Hankook
Yokohama
DimensionsR15 - R20 R16 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,21,72,11,01,2
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Rating: Satisfactory
2,42,72,62,02,0
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
Rating: Satisfactory
2,72,62,1 2,02,6
Show test details