Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Yokohama (57%). The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Ventus Prime3 K125 and the BluEarth RV-02 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Ventus Prime3 K125 is made - Hungary.
# | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R16 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Upper-middle
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Satisfactory2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,1 | 2,0 | 2,6 | ||
Show test details |