Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R19 | R17 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, we have a head-to-head comparison between the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 and the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti. Both tyres are summer models from reputable manufacturers, Hankook, a global brand known for its high-quality tyres and Vredestein, a Dutch company that has been making tyres since 1908.
Looking at the test data, it's clear that both tyres have solid performances in different categories. However, one can see some strengths and weaknesses on both sides. The Hankook Ventus stands out for its exterior noise and rolling resistance features. On the flip side, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti excels in dry handling according to the Autobild testing.
When comparing mutual test positions, it's a relatively close call. In Autobild, Vredestein took the 3rd place out of 9 tyres tested, while Hankook stood at 5th position. Meanwhile, in the Gute-Fahrt test, Vredestein had a less favourable position at the bottom of the 10 tyre ratings, while Hankook once again clinched the 5th spot.
Moving onto the Automotorsport tests, Hankook managed to outrank Vredestein, placing 3rd in a field of 8 tyres, as compared to Vredestein's 4th place. Similarly, in the Sportscars test, Hankook scored higher, ranking 2nd out of 6 tyres, while Vredestein was placed 5th. Finally, in the ADAC testing, Vredestein surprisingly surpassed Hankook, earning the 4th spot out of 16, whereas Hankook ranked 5th.
When summarizing the overall test data, it can be seen that Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 fares better in broader categories, ranking consistently in the top 5. It's especially notable in noise reduction and rolling resistance. However, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti isn't far behind. It offers superior dry handling, an essential feature for summer tyres, but its test positions vary more.
In conclusion, while both tyres offer compelling pros and cons, the final decision is based on your specific needs and driving conditions. If noise reduction and rolling resistance are high on your list, consider the Hankook model. But if you're looking for a tyre with excellent dry handling, the Vredestein model might just be the right fit.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Very good - | |||||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,6 | 9,5 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Recommended | 8,6 | 8,8 | 8,6 | 8 | 9 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Recommended | 8,5 | 8,1 | 9,5 | 5 | 7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: - | 2 | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 1,9 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,3 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
