Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1-evo Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1-evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Kumho (54%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has a better rating of 77% compared to 60% of the Hankook Ventus S1-evo. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 245/30 R20 test, where both the Ventus S1-evo and the Ecsta PS71 were tested.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1-evo | Kumho Ecsta PS71 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1-evo Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1-evo Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3 | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||