Segment
2. Firestone Destination Winter Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 vs. Firestone Destination Winter
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Firestone (60%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 and Firestone Destination Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Firestone Destination Winter first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Firestone Destination Winter has B rating.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
| Firestone Destination Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Recommended2. Firestone Destination Winter Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Destination Winter Satisfactory2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Still recommended
