In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Hankook (83%). The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 and the UltraGrip Performance+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 85% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 has C wet grip rating, whereas 83% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has B rating. We also know where Winter i*cept evo2 W320 is made - Hungary.
# | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R15 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2+ | ||||
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 8,9 | ||||||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Good | 7,6 | ||||||
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Very good | 8,9 | ||||||
Show test details |