Segment
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Kumho (61%). The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 was done in 2020, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 225/40 R18 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo3 W330 and the WinterCraft WP71 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 has C rating.
# | Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Exemplary2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2+ | ||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2+ | 2- | 3 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 | 32,3 | 25 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 35,7 | 28 | |||||
Show test details |