Segment
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Premium2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 vs. Sava Eskimo S3+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Sava (62%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 and Sava Eskimo S3+, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS W442 and the Eskimo S3+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (83%) of the Sava Eskimo S3+ also have C wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442
| Sava Eskimo S3+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R15 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 | 41,6 | 28,5 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo S3+ | 43,0 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 100 | 100,6 | ||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 | 92,6 | 97,8 | 96,5 | ||||
| Sava Eskimo S3+ | 94,4 | 96,4 | 100,6 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
