Segment
2. Kenda Wintergen 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Kenda (0%). But when it comes to comparing Kenda Wintergen 2 and Continental WinterContact TS 860, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kenda Wintergen 2 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 860 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Wintergen 2 and the WinterContact TS 860 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Kenda Wintergen 2
| Continental WinterContact TS 860
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R17 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Kenda Wintergen 2 Lowcost
2. Kenda Wintergen 2 27.33
1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good2. Kenda Wintergen 2 Conditionally recommended
2. Kenda Wintergen 2 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Kenda Wintergen 2 | 35,3 | - | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 31,5 | 24,5 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 206 | 67 | 68 | 43 | 19 | 8 | 10 |
Kenda Wintergen 2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 173 | 67 | 36 | 39 | 13 | 8 | 10 |
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Test winner | 206 | 66 | 68 | 43 | 16 | 7 | 6 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
Kenda Wintergen 2 | 40,9 | - | |||||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 34,5 | 27,6 | |||||
Show test details |