Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Upper-middle2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Toyo Proxes CF2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber summer tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Toyo (48%). In this particular case, the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 has a better rating of 41% compared to 34% of the Toyo Proxes CF2. The first tyre test of Kleber Dynaxer HP3 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Toyo Proxes CF2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Dynaxer HP3 and the Proxes CF2 were tested.
| # | Kleber Dynaxer HP3 | Toyo Proxes CF2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 ? dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 | 39,2 | 37,7 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 | 37,8 | 40,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||