Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005
Table of contents:
| # | Kleber Dynaxer HP4
| Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and the Bridgestone Turanza T005 represent two high-performing summer tyres from leading manufacturers Kleber and Bridgestone. This comparison review brings together data from multiple tyre tests to help you make an informed choice.
The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 scored an 82% rating in our tests, making it a reliable pick. It shines in exterior noise, delivering a smooth, quiet ride. However, critiques from Autobild and ADAC tests referenced its slower steering response and limited grip in wet conditions as areas for improvement. A highlight from our tests was good aquaplaning characteristics, with additional positives being good comfort and short dry and wet braking distances.
Moving onto the Bridgestone Turanza T005, this tyre excels in many areas, earning an impressive 89% rating in our tests. Outstanding features include its excellent dry and wet handling, high grip, and precise steering. It placed 4th out of 17 in the ADAC test, outperforming the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 which obtained the 11th rank. In terms of shortcomings, reports from Autobild and ADAC tests indicated a slightly increased tyre wear.
Based on test positions, Bridgestone's Turanza T005 consistently ranked higher than the Kleber Dynaxer HP4. However, the Dynaxer HP4's strengths in short braking distances and quieter exterior noise mean it is not to be completely overlooked. It's important to consider your individual driving conditions and requirements when choosing the best tyre.
In conclusion, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 offers an overall higher performance, presenting better grip, and improved handling in both dry and wet conditions. While the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 trails somewhat in overall performance- it does offer considerable advantages in terms of noise reduction and comfort.
While each tyre presents its own strengths and weaknesses, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 is the overall winner in direct comparison, meeting a wider range of requirements for summer driving. However, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 still stands as a viable choice for drivers prioritizing comfort and noise reduction.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Rolling resistance
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 1 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 1,8 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,4 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,2 | 3,5 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
