Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kleber summer tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Bridgestone (57%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 has a better rating of 89% compared to 82% of the Kleber Dynaxer HP4. The first tyre test of Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was done in 2020, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Dynaxer HP4 and the Turanza T005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | Bridgestone Turanza T005 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 1 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 1,8 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,4 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,2 | 3,5 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||