Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
# | Kleber Dynaxer UHP
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
If you are deciding between the Kleber Dynaxer UHP and the Firestone Roadhawk, a closer look at each tyre's features and their performance in tests can help.
The Kleber Dynaxer UHP is a summer tyre rated at 68% by our team. Its greatest strength was observed in reducing exterior noise, according to Autobild's test results, where it placed 15th out of 53 tyres altogether. On the downside, this tyre was criticized by autobild 2023 for moderate grip and low lateral control on wet roads, as well as limited aquaplaning reserves. Despite these weaknesses, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP showed good mileage performance and a low rolling resistance. You can discover more about the Kleber Dynaxer UHP and its manufacturer, Kleber, via the provided links. This model has not been replaced by a newer version yet.
On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk is also a summer tyre but enjoys a slightly higher rating of 72%. In the same Autobild test, it managed to secure the 13th position, outperforming the Dynaxer UHP. The detailed data from the same test has not been provided here, therefore, we can't comment on its particular strengths and weaknesses based on the Autobuild 2023's report. Further details about the Firestone Roadhawk and its manufacturer, Firestone are easily accessible through the given links. No new model has replaced this tyre till now.
In summary, both the Kleber Dynaxer UHP and Firestone Roadhawk show comparable performance, with the latter having a slight edge. The Dynaxer UHP excels in terms of exterior noise reduction, mileage, and rolling resistance but doesn't fare well when grip and aquaplaning resistance are concerned. Comparatively, the data provided doesn't allow for the same level of detailed analysis for the Roadhawk tyre.
While every consumer may have different priorities when it comes to tyre choice, these comparisons based on test results can provide useful insights. Interested readers are encouraged to explore each tyre's link for a more comprehensive understanding before making a decision.
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 64.5 | 28 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 67.7 | 30.9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 34,1 | 32,2 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 34,3 | 30,8 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | ||||
Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 35,9 | 32,1 | |||||
Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 32 | |||||
Show test details |