Segment
2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran SNOW vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Kormoran (14%). The first tyre test of Kormoran SNOW was done in 2021, compared to 2016 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 860 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran SNOW has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Continental WinterContact TS 860 has B rating.
| # | Kormoran SNOW
| Continental WinterContact TS 860
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Kormoran SNOW 16.
Worst position in test
2. Kormoran SNOW 39.
Average position in tests
2. Kormoran SNOW 32.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Kormoran SNOW 55%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Kormoran SNOW 68%
Wet braking
2. Kormoran SNOW 67%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
1. Kormoran SNOW 100%
Snow traction
1. Kormoran SNOW 95%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Kormoran SNOW 88%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Kormoran SNOW 73%
