Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran SNOW vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Yokohama winter tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Kormoran (12%). The first tyre test of Kormoran SNOW was done in 2021, compared to 2018 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran SNOW dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Kormoran SNOW
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Kormoran SNOW 16.
Worst position in test
2. Kormoran SNOW 39.
Average position in tests
2. Kormoran SNOW 32.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Kormoran SNOW 68%
Wet braking
2. Kormoran SNOW 67%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Kormoran SNOW 55%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Kormoran SNOW 73%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Kormoran SNOW 88%
