Segment
1. Kormoran Snowpro b2 Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran Snowpro b2 vs. Barum Polaris 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Kormoran (12%). But when it comes to comparing Kormoran Snowpro b2 and Barum Polaris 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Snowpro b2 and the Polaris 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran Snowpro b2 has E wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Barum Polaris 3 has C rating.
| # | Kormoran Snowpro b2
| Barum Polaris 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Kormoran Snowpro b2 | 42,9 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 35,8 | 27,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Kormoran Snowpro b2 | 48,6 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 40,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
