Segment
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecowing ES31 vs. Nokian WetProof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Kumho (54%). In this particular case, the Nokian WetProof has a better rating of 83% compared to 65% of the Kumho Ecowing ES31. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecowing ES31 was done in 2022, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Ecowing ES31 and the WetProof were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 69% of Kumho Ecowing ES31 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WetProof has A rating.
| # | Kumho Ecowing ES31 | Nokian WetProof | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||