Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 73% compared to 65% of the Sava Intensa HP2. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the Sava Intensa HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ecsta HS52 and the Intensa HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A wet grip rating, whereas 91% of Sava Intensa HP2 has B rating.
# | Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Sava Intensa HP2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R15 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa HP2 Lowcost
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.672. Sava Intensa HP2 18.25
1. Sava Intensa HP2 Good2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Sava Intensa HP2 Satisfactory
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
Sava Intensa HP2 | 37,2 | 30,0 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,3 | |||||
Sava Intensa HP2 Rating: Good | 2,6 | 2,8 | |||||
Show test details |